Skip to content

Benchmarks

Side-by-side against the closest comparables. Each row is a qualitative check against each protocol’s public docs and our own on-chain reads, not a head-to-head benchmark number. Where Atrium loses, we say so.

Chain

Atrium
Arbitrum + RH-Chain (when SDK)
Cascade
Solana
August
Solana

Margin compute

Atrium
Stylus (Rust, ~10-100x cheaper compute-heavy ops, per Arbitrum Stylus)
Cascade
Native Solana programs
August
N/A

Open adapter standard

Atrium
IPorticoAdapter v1.0 (MIT)
Cascade
Closed
August
Closed

Agent integration

Atrium
Sigil EIP-712 + Postern session keys + ERC-8004
Cascade
Limited
August
None

Formal verification

Atrium
9 Kani proofs authored; CI lane Month 3
Cascade
Audit only
August
Audit only

UX polish today

Atrium
Foundation: Verifier Mode complete, app surfaces in progress
Cascade
More mature
August
More mature

Mainnet live

Atrium
No, testnet build phase
Cascade
Yes
August
Yes

Honest read: the Solana-native comparables have UX polish and mainnet liveness Atrium does not yet match. Atrium leads on chain choice (EVM is larger), open standards, agent-layer depth, and formal verification. The polish gap closes as the app surfaces complete; the standards gap holds.